Ever since i found out about Utau and other stuff I haven’t been too interested in furbies anyways I’m fabtigerfurby. Aka fabfourfurbies3
I am going to be researching on furby boom and other prototypes
What's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
- All1546 posts
- General905 posts
- Furby Discussion113 posts
- Fakes Discussion107 posts
- Furby Artwork69 posts
- Show Your Furby96 posts
- Contests5 posts
- Questions and Answers136 posts
- Off Topic58 posts
- Polls28 posts
- News and Announcements29 posts
Sort by
Card Layout
General
905 Posts
2.5k Replies
(The photo is not mine)
Bros definitely worth the 62 dollars i would have to pay for them/j
Here is a first look at the completed Neon Star variant.
Toh loo kah paint GOOD.
I’m pretty sure there’s enough information on the Fresh anew Look Frog Furby to register it as official
Heres Why:
In this listing I found on worthpoint today, the Furby is seen it it’s box, and it has the “Fresh New Look” sticker on it. It also still has the original tape on the top and bottom of the box.
It has white eyelids and white eyelashes instead of the lime green eyelids and yellow eyelashes that regular Frog Furby’s have
It has the factory code “C015” which corresponds with the WT factory on its base. A majority of Fresh New Look Furby’s I’ve found have that factory code on its base.
The box has the later version of the Furby story that Fresh New Look Furby’s have. I’ve also never seen a regular Frog Furby with the later version of the Furby story.
(PS: The Fresh New Look Frog Furby is on the Furby Models not yet verified page)
(Edited by Furble1998)
what do i doooooooooooo?
May-may: Wicked (acts and looks like Glinda)
Greenie-Meanie: Beetlejuice (obviously)
Star-Lee: Gravity Falls (might like it because space is mysterious, like the show)
Dah-Tee: Minnie's Bow-toons (looks like Minnie Mouse)
Mer-May: The Little Mermaid (1989 movie) (obviously)
Par-Tay: Toy Story (don't know why, it just seems like it to me)
hair baby (3 variant) hoody pet (1 variant i think)
i found another photo without origin in this fandom!
Higher ranking mods will ultimately have more of a say on this, but I propose a ban on using AI to write articles. It is very prone to errors, bad for the environment, and in blatant violation of many copyright laws. I think it goes against the spirit of the wiki, which is to have a database compiled by people working together. If you need a machine to churn out the articles for you, where's the fun and sense of community in that?
Relevant article: https://drewdevault.com/2025/03/17/2025-03-17-Stop-externalizing-your-costs-on-me.html
I would do a poll, but it doesn't seem to be letting me embed one in this post, so you can discuss in the comments. Keep in mind, higher ranking mods have the ultimate say, and let's keep it civil, please.
UPDATE: Per the moderators' decision, AI is now banned.
(Edited by Furbland)
